You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi - I'm trying to use LBLRTM to calculate the clear sky radiance for a VZA = 84.345 degrees (hence angle is set at 95.655 in the TAPE5 below). However, I receive the following error:
"ERROR - FSCGEO"
LBLRTM v12.10 (compiled using Intel Fortran Compiler v2017 - both single and double precision versions give the same error).
AER v3.8 line file
Running on Oracle Enterprise Linux 7 (64 bit).
Please let me know if you require any additional info.
I can calculate the radiances (or layer optical depths) for VZA = 0.0, 16, 36, 55 and 72 without any issues.
I want to be able to compare the LBLRTM radiances at these angles with another RT code for a validation exercise. Please can you advise how I can calculate the radiances for such a low angle? If it's not possible, what is the limitation and how does this impact the ability to accurately calculate fluxes?
Thanks for your interest in LBLRTM. I have some idea of what is going wrong, but I would like to run some tests. Please send me (kcadyper@aer.com) the TAPE5 as a file, so that I don't need to reformat it.
Hi - I'm trying to use LBLRTM to calculate the clear sky radiance for a VZA = 84.345 degrees (hence angle is set at 95.655 in the TAPE5 below). However, I receive the following error:
"ERROR - FSCGEO"
LBLRTM v12.10 (compiled using Intel Fortran Compiler v2017 - both single and double precision versions give the same error).
AER v3.8 line file
Running on Oracle Enterprise Linux 7 (64 bit).
Please let me know if you require any additional info.
I can calculate the radiances (or layer optical depths) for VZA = 0.0, 16, 36, 55 and 72 without any issues.
I want to be able to compare the LBLRTM radiances at these angles with another RT code for a validation exercise. Please can you advise how I can calculate the radiances for such a low angle? If it's not possible, what is the limitation and how does this impact the ability to accurately calculate fluxes?
Many thanks in advance.
TAPE5 below:
$ TAPE5 generated for TRP STD Atmos., Dec 18 16:33:47 2020 UTC
HI=1 F4=1 CN=5 AE=0 EM=1 SC=0 FI=0 PL=0 TS=0 AM=1 MG=0 LA=0 OD=0 XS=0 00 00
50.0000 1650.0000 4.000E+00 0.000E+00 4.000E-02 3.600E+01 2.000E-04 1.000E-03 0
2.997E+02 1.000E+00
1 2 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0.000 120.000
120.000 0.000 95.655
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
%%%%%
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: