From 52d086652722daaeaecba2c6ac1b66302357a882 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ben Sigelman Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 14:13:42 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Clarify maintenance of auto-instr repos (#57) * Clarify maintenance of auto-instr repos * Make the implicit explicit per PR comment --- text/0001-telemetry-without-manual-instrumentation.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/text/0001-telemetry-without-manual-instrumentation.md b/text/0001-telemetry-without-manual-instrumentation.md index 201d4d775..870ac348d 100644 --- a/text/0001-telemetry-without-manual-instrumentation.md +++ b/text/0001-telemetry-without-manual-instrumentation.md @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ There are some languages that will have OpenTelemetry support before they have D ### Governance of the auto-instrumentation libraries -The maintainers for each language `foo` will retain their Approver/Maintainer status and privileges for the `auto-instr-foo` repositories. +Each `auto-instr-foo` repository must have at least one [Maintainer](https://github.com/open-telemetry/community/blob/master/community-membership.md#maintainer) in common with the main `opentelemetry-foo` language repository. There are no other requirements or constraints about the set of maintainers/approvers for the main language repository and the respective auto-instrumentation repository; in particular, there may be maintainers/approvers of the main language repository that are not maintainers/approvers for the auto-instrumentation repository, and vice versa. ### Mini-FAQ about this proposal