Timers are off

[jacobly0]

I think cpu_restore_next can't be called inside port.c -> sched_process_pending_events. Should I move it out or conditionalize it.

[jacobly0]

Here's the latest timer testing program.

[adriweb]

Here's the latest timer testing program.

This manages to crash CEmu, actually :P
Assertion failed: (0 <= delay && delay <= 2), function gpt_next_event, file ../../core/timers.c, line 64.

[mateoconlechuga]

Move it out :)

[jacobly0]

Fixed the cpu_restore_next issue in 9133e0c, but now graphing triggers the assert reproducibly.

[jacobly0]

Fixed the graphing assert in 376ed58, now back to the original issue.

[jacobly0]

Now enabling a 32K asserts...

[mateoconlechuga]

branch before it's too late ;)

[jacobly0]

Fixed this assert with cd7afbd and fixed all but one case of the offset timers with 93c4cff, now to just fix that.

[jacobly0]

Fixed a bunch of obscure offset issues in 296fb15, so now I think everything works except lines 0-4.

[adriweb]

Nice job!

I've moved to 1.x the two other remaining issues that we originally planned to fix for 1.1, but clearly they'll take some more time to (re)dive into, analyze, and fix.
So I guess when this one is closed (or if you think it's good enough as it is now?), it should be good to release v1.1 :)

[mateoconlechuga]

Good enough for me :) Let's do a release! :D

[adriweb]

Good enough for me :) Let's do a release! :D

I'm just waiting for @jacobly0 to give his green light :P The lang stuff got updated in the meantime.

[adriweb]

Fixed the graphing assert in 376ed58, now back to the original issue.

Just had a freeze when trying to graph something, so it looks like a release will have to wait (assuming it's directly related) for this to be fixed at least :(
Repro equation in Y1: fnInt(X,X,0,X)
Edit: simpler repro : "XX" (but X² works...)

[jacobly0]

Fixed graphing freeze with f3c109c.

[adriweb]

Yep, can confirm :)

[mateoconlechuga]

CLOSE IT :D

[jacobly0]

#254 was closed a while ago, but this issue is for the few subtle remaining issues, and so won't be closed for some time, and therefore, should not be considered a blocker.