You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This repository has an open source license (the MIT license), but the model is hosted separately and is not actually contained in the repository, merely linked from it.
Would you consider adding a license for the provided VQGAN models, and for vqgan_imagenet_f16_16384 in particular?
I am aware of the fact that you don't own the dataset or the images, but, if you did all of the training, it would still be useful under the theory that models aren't derivatives of the data, but they are copyrightable by those who did the training.
I think using the same license as that of the repo would simplify things.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi!
The vqgan_imagenet_f16_16384 model in particular has been used by other interesting projects.
This repository has an open source license (the MIT license), but the model is hosted separately and is not actually contained in the repository, merely linked from it.
Would you consider adding a license for the provided VQGAN models, and for
vqgan_imagenet_f16_16384
in particular?I am aware of the fact that you don't own the dataset or the images, but, if you did all of the training, it would still be useful under the theory that models aren't derivatives of the data, but they are copyrightable by those who did the training.
I think using the same license as that of the repo would simplify things.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: