ddB/dT = dP/dT * ddB/dP

[hyunjimoon]

Parameter	More is Less	More is More
DR (Market Stability)	Duo may prefer a more stable market to reduce coordination costs and disagreements between founders. A stable market allows for more predictable decision making.	Duo may be more willing to tackle dynamic markets because they can divide and conquer, with each founder focusing on different changing aspects. Duo has more total cognitive bandwidth to process a dynamic environment.
SR (Market Size)	Duo may prefer to target a smaller market initially to prove their business model with fewer resources. Starting small also reduces the risk of conflict between founders.	Duo may target larger markets from the start because they have more combined resources, connections and credibility than a solo founder. Larger markets provide more opportunities for the founders to pursue different customer segments if needed.
BR (Optimism)	Duo may be less optimistic than a very confident solo founder because the duo has to constantly calibrate their expectations with each other, reducing individual over-optimism.	Duo may be more optimistic than a timid solo founder because the founders can reinforce each other's confidence. Having a shared vision can increase the optimism beyond what either founder would have individually. It's unclear if duo would be consistently more or less optimistic than solo. It likely depends on the individual traits of the founders and their interpersonal dynamics.
DB (Market Acceptance Info)	Duo may have less information on market acceptance because each founder has limited bandwidth to gather external data while also coordinating internally. Some market information could get lost in the "telephone game" between founders.	Duo likely has more total information on market acceptance because they can tap into two separate networks and have two pairs of eyes and ears open to the market. They can cover more ground in customer discovery.
ER (Experiment Opportunity)	Duo may have fewer experiment opportunities because some experiments could be vetoed by the other founder. With shared resources, each founder may be more conservative in deploying experiments.	Duo can run more experiments in parallel by dividing and conquering. They also have a larger combined pool of resources and mental bandwidth to deploy a greater number and variety of experiments.
CT (Market-Product Confidence Ratio)	Duo may have a lower ratio (relatively more confidence in product than market) because the founders reinforce each other's confidence in their own product. Overconfidence in one's own product is a common pitfall.	Duo may have a higher ratio (relatively more confidence in market than product) because they can do more market research and the Product Confidence gets divided across two founders' visions. Reaching agreement provides a check against Product overconfidence.

claudeAI believes

• Duo has some clear advantages in Market Size (SR), Market Acceptance Info (DB) and Experiment Opportunity (ER).
• trade-offs seem more complex for Market Stability (DR), Optimism (BR) and Market-Product Confidence Ratio (CT).

--
TGP:

1. understand Note_20240409_0920_otter_ai.txt script based on the above conversation.

2. based on your experience or observation,
   DR.Does duo tend to choose more stable or dynamic market, than solopreneurs?

SR.Does duo tend to choose smaller or larger market, than solopreneurs?

BR.Does duo tend to be less or more optimistic, than solopreneurs?

DB.Does duo tend to have less or more information on market acceptance, than solopreneurs?

ER.Does duo tend to have less or more experiment opportunity, than solopreneurs?

CT.Does duo tend to have lower or higher mp_confidence_ratio (diffuseness of market belief (sigma_market)/diffuseness of product belief (sigma_product)), than solopreneurs?

3. start by making table. this table would have six rows and three columns.

4. second column is "more is less" and each cell will list reasons why duo will choose stable market (DR row), smaller market (SR row), less optimistic (BR row), less information on market acceptance (DB row), less experiment opportunity (ER row), lower mp_confidence_ratio. If it's hard to generalize, give reasoning from both side (e.g. duo may be less optimistic than very confident solo, but more optimistic than timid solo due to through value evaluation reinforcing mechanism between the two)

5. third column is "more is more" and each cell will list reasons why duo will choose dynamic market (DR row) and larger market (SR row), be more optimistic (BR row), have more information on market acceptance (DB row), more experiment opportunity (ER row), lower mp_confidence_ratio.

6. some may be hard to generalize e.g. for BR row, duo may be less optimistic than very confident solo, but more optimistic than timid solo due to through value evaluation reinforcing mechanism between the two. just express your confusion and ask for additional input.