-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
hellokan.ipynb returns NaN instead of formula. #179
Comments
Hi, the problem was caused by the appearance of the log function (which is unexpected behavior). This means that the pruning step is not good. Could you show the plot you have after pruning? From feedback from others, you may try |
I encountered a similar issue, but I found that increasing the step size helped. |
@Stealeristaken, in block [8], it should again specify the threshold |
@ShuleiCao Thanks, yes, the pruning results can depend on quite many factors. Training longer will usually end up a sparser network. |
Hi.
I was trying hellokan.ipynb file. I do some scaleup at training steps like 50 -> 150. In the end train_loss started to return NaN instead of any value.
I thought maybe it's a kernel error. So I re-downloaded the baseline hellokan.ipynb and rerun without any editing. It returned NaN once again. I will drop screenshot about problem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: