Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Calibration/rectification beyond what's hardware supplied #524

Open
ahundt opened this issue Jan 5, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

Calibration/rectification beyond what's hardware supplied #524

ahundt opened this issue Jan 5, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@ahundt
Copy link

ahundt commented Jan 5, 2016

While the hardware provides methods for calibration, it seems the results achievable from calibrating by hand can be much better than the one provided by the hardware. For example note the images in iai-kinect2's readme.md showing how things improve with the calibration they provide.

Libraries of interest for calibration:

This may not necessarily come in the form of a dependency. It could simply be support for some param file that applies alternative parameters to the driver and notes explaining a process to follow to get those alternative parameters.

@ahundt ahundt changed the title Support for calibration/rectification Support for calibration/rectification beyond the hardware supplied one Jan 5, 2016
@ahundt ahundt changed the title Support for calibration/rectification beyond the hardware supplied one Calibration/rectification beyond the hardware supplied one Jan 5, 2016
@ahundt ahundt changed the title Calibration/rectification beyond the hardware supplied one Calibration/rectification beyond what's hardware supplied Jan 5, 2016
@floe
Copy link
Contributor

floe commented Jan 5, 2016

Hm, I'm a bit divided about that one - libfreenect2 is mostly supposed to provide an interface to the hardware, everything else is better suited for other libraries. This would be far easier if the factory calibration would conform to regular intrinsic/extrinsic camera parameters, but as it is now, we'd need a separate implementation for external calibration data.

@ttsesm
Copy link

ttsesm commented Jan 6, 2016

+1 @ahundt I also think that the option of external calibration will be a nice add on to the library.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants