Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 24, 2021. It is now read-only.

*.schema.mfl - is it used to localize the schema.mof file? #292

Open
johlju opened this issue Jul 8, 2017 · 8 comments
Open

*.schema.mfl - is it used to localize the schema.mof file? #292

johlju opened this issue Jul 8, 2017 · 8 comments
Labels
documentation The issue is related to documentation only. help wanted The issue is up for grabs for anyone in the community.

Comments

@johlju
Copy link
Contributor

johlju commented Jul 8, 2017

I see that there is a .mfl file in the en-US folder of the resource MSFT_WindowsFeature. Here; https://github.com/PowerShell/PSDscResources/blob/dev/DscResources/MSFT_WindowsFeature/en-US/MSFT_WindowsFeature.schema.mfl

Is this file used to localize the schema.mof file? If it is so, then I guess this should be added to other module resources when we start to localize.

I can't find any information about this file type anywhere (so far).

@johlju
Copy link
Contributor Author

johlju commented Jul 8, 2017

@mbreakey3 and @kwirkykat Is this something you can help answering?

@kwirkykat
Copy link
Member

@johlju I think it's required for the in-box module (PSDesiredStateConfiguration) for localization for the Windows build. Mariah and I weren't really sure what it was for so we just left it in.

@nitinbps @Indhukrishna @narrieta Do you know what the schema.mfl is for?

@kwirkykat kwirkykat added the question The issue is a question. label Jul 11, 2017
@nitinbps
Copy link

Yes, the mfl file is used to localize actual MOF file.

@johlju
Copy link
Contributor Author

johlju commented Jul 12, 2017

Cool @nitinbps. Do you know any site, article or blog explaining it? Curious what amended means, and what localization country codes can be used.

@nitinbps
Copy link

@johlju There is some general information @ https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa389767(v=vs.85).aspx.

@johlju
Copy link
Contributor Author

johlju commented Jul 13, 2017

@nitinbps Thank you for the link!

So this is definitely something we should do. I will look at this and, if someone doesn't beat me to it, I will try to put together something for the BestPractices.md so this get documented.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 8, 2018

This issue has been automatically marked as needs more information because it has not had activity from the community in the last 30 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 10 days. If the issue is labelled with any of the work labels (e.g bug, enhancement, documentation, or tests) then the issue will not auto-close.

@stale stale bot added the needs more information The issue needs more information from the author or the community. label Jun 8, 2018
@johlju
Copy link
Contributor Author

johlju commented Jun 8, 2018

Marking this as documentation and help wanted. Can be added to Best Practices after PR #403 is merged.

@stale stale bot removed the needs more information The issue needs more information from the author or the community. label Jun 8, 2018
@johlju johlju added help wanted The issue is up for grabs for anyone in the community. documentation The issue is related to documentation only. and removed question The issue is a question. labels Jun 8, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
documentation The issue is related to documentation only. help wanted The issue is up for grabs for anyone in the community.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants