Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Investigate if the disease->phenotype mapping should be filtered #14

Closed
dkoslicki opened this issue Mar 6, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Investigate if the disease->phenotype mapping should be filtered #14

dkoslicki opened this issue Mar 6, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
low priority

Comments

@dkoslicki
Copy link
Member

From @saramsey on November 17, 2017 20:15

We're getting a huge expansion when we map disease->phenotype. Are some of these super-general phenotypes that are high on the phenotype ontology tree? Not sure if that is a problem.

Copied from original issue: dkoslicki/NCATS#36
@dkoslicki dkoslicki mentioned this issue Mar 6, 2018
Closed
@dkoslicki
Copy link
Member Author

Closing as not relevant anymore.

@jaredroach jaredroach mentioned this issue Apr 16, 2018
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
low priority
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@dkoslicki