-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 634
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PROPOSAL] Make docker integration better #53
Comments
I'm not very familiar with docker so |
@SystemRage Hi, that sounds really good! I already started to work on the required changes but now ran into an issue with docker hub. They require me to have the Ownership of the repo I configure the auto builds for (my fork it already works). Of course thats not possible! To still make this work I tested a workaround: I would like to ask you to create an own account on the docker hub and create a new Organisation. Then link your GitHub account to this Organisation (make sure to select limited access, so docker only sees your public projects). After that you can (temporarly) add me (note that my username on docker hub is |
@SystemRage I would like to update the wiki, but I can't find any edit button (like over on GitLab). Could you assist me on that? |
Okay, since I'm not able to update the wiki, I call this issue closed. |
If you still want i added wiki files as markdown so you can create PRs on it. |
@SystemRage What would you think about an other approach? In the last days i started to work with Hugo (and really like it) - it is also able to generate an static site from Markdown files. With this a new doc folder would be needed inside the repo. Also an other repo to git push the static files to... Maybe a little bit too complicated - demo... OR ...maybe Sphinx? I don't have too much experience with it, but I guess they both work very similar. Sphinx also is used for readthedocs - and I think that would be a great addition to this project! Demo In any way: With this new approach any user is able to receive a copy of the wiki inside the repo folder AND they can directly commit to it. This way you don't need to update the wiki manually. As always: Because I want to learn this anyways I offer my help - if you approve this I would start a new PR to implement this. Maybe I'll need your help for the Sphinx integration - we'll see. |
Certainly, go ahead. |
Superseeded by #82 |
I would like to see a better integration into docker. @SystemRage What do you think about following changes:
If @SystemRage approves this, I would happy to create the necessary merge requests and help at the realisation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: