You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I'm very interested in your work. And I want to know that if I could train your depth version MVDiffusion model but using SD without depth cond. (e.g. SDv1.5)? And if yes, do you have any advice on how to sample images from the entire camera trajectory to perform consistency well according to your experience. And the last question is, if the precision of depth values matter in training process? Maybe I use some depth values from bounding box to train.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@Tangshitao Sorry I don't exactly understand what you mean. Let me clarify something, I mean using depths to calculate the correspondence but don't use depths as the condition when generating images. Do you mean without depth cond. the results are not expected as with depth cond.?
Hi, I'm very interested in your work. And I want to know that if I could train your
depth
version MVDiffusion model but using SD without depth cond. (e.g. SDv1.5)? And if yes, do you have any advice on how to sample images from the entire camera trajectory to perform consistency well according to your experience. And the last question is, if the precision of depth values matter in training process? Maybe I use some depth values from bounding box to train.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: