We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
https://github.com/nexB/scancode-toolkit/blob/develop/src/licensedcode/data/rules/openssl-ssleay_gpl_mention_openssl.RULE is not a license notice:
Permission to use under GPL terms is granted.
This is present in OpenSSL like at https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/master/crypto/sha/asm/sha256-armv4.pl or BoringSSL and derivative like https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apple/swift-nio-ssl/7c381eb6083542b124a6c18fae742f55001dc2b5/Sources/CNIOBoringSSL/crypto/fipsmodule/bsaes-armv7-ios.ios.arm.S but should NOT be reported as a GPL at all as this is noise.
We could also just treat this as a false positive entirely, or report it as OpenSSL-licensed since this is always seen with the previous "cryptograms" match: https://github.com/nexB/scancode-toolkit/blob/develop/src/licensedcode/data/rules/openssl-ssleay_or_bsd-new_2.RULE
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The same applies to https://github.com/apple/swift-nio-ssl/blob/7c381eb6083542b124a6c18fae742f55001dc2b5/Sources/CNIOBoringSSL/crypto/fipsmodule/sha256-armv8-linux.linux.aarch64.S Permission to use under GPLv2 terms is granted.
Permission to use under GPLv2 terms is granted.
Sorry, something went wrong.
See also this rule https://github.com/nexB/scancode-toolkit/blob/develop/src/licensedcode/data/rules/openssl-ssleay_or_bsd-new_or_gpl-1.0-plus_or_gpl-2.0_1.RULE that needs some love too as there is no gpl-1.0-plus in it.
#3841 might be similar.
No branches or pull requests
https://github.com/nexB/scancode-toolkit/blob/develop/src/licensedcode/data/rules/openssl-ssleay_gpl_mention_openssl.RULE is not a license notice:
Permission to use under GPL terms is granted.
This is present in OpenSSL like at https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/master/crypto/sha/asm/sha256-armv4.pl or BoringSSL and derivative like https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apple/swift-nio-ssl/7c381eb6083542b124a6c18fae742f55001dc2b5/Sources/CNIOBoringSSL/crypto/fipsmodule/bsaes-armv7-ios.ios.arm.S but should NOT be reported as a GPL at all as this is noise.
We could also just treat this as a false positive entirely, or report it as OpenSSL-licensed since this is always seen with the previous "cryptograms" match: https://github.com/nexB/scancode-toolkit/blob/develop/src/licensedcode/data/rules/openssl-ssleay_or_bsd-new_2.RULE
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: