Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Write architecture overview #376

Closed
andygrove opened this issue Oct 17, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #977
Closed

Write architecture overview #376

andygrove opened this issue Oct 17, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #977
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@andygrove
Copy link
Member

Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe what you are trying to do.
Ballista has a complex architecture and it is hard to understand by just walking through the code.

Describe the solution you'd like
I would like a document in he repo, with diagrams, that explains how everything fits together. Topics to cover:

  • BallistaContext (local and remote)
  • How BallistaContext wraps DataFusion context and how state is managed from a remote client
  • Python bindings
  • How scheduler persists execution graphs and tasks
  • How schedule & executor co-ordinate on allocating tasks and reporting results back

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

@andygrove andygrove added enhancement New feature or request documentation Improvements or additions to documentation labels Oct 17, 2022
@andygrove andygrove added this to the Ballista 0.10.0 milestone Oct 17, 2022
@andygrove andygrove removed this from the Ballista 0.10.0 milestone Nov 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant