-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
Linux builds not available on conda-forge channel #3
Comments
No idea. Are you getting an error, signal, or something that is causing it to stop? |
@pelson, won't be back for a bit, but I'm going to put this one on his radar. We have seen one other feedstock run to the point of test completion and not upload anything. Though we are still unsure why that is. |
nope: the end of the 2.7 build looks normal. Running the docker stuff locally hacked up with some more debugging to see what i can see... |
FWIW it seems that the CircleCI PRs didn't run anything other than Python 2.7. So, that's a bit odd. |
Indeed! |
One meta question: why is conda-build-all not used in the docker setup? |
So, |
Well, specifically in the run_docker_build template, separate blocks are created for each of the (in this case) pythons... i thought conda-build-all would do that automagically, i.e. one call to conda-build-all vs many calls to conda build. But i imagine there is a fine reason. I had just gotten used to testing it locally that way. Making some headway locally: basically |
Ok, it looks like deep under the covers, it looks like one of the following is indeed throwing an unexpected signal:
haven't determined which or what... I am inclined to drop the full test suite on linux (just bail on not |
conda-forge/erlang-feedstock#1 saw a similar issue |
So, I see Linux builds on conda-forge. Appears this is resolved. Should we close this? |
Yeah! |
On the initial commit, and on the merging of the most recent feedstock, linux builds were not uploaded:
https://anaconda.org/conda-forge/nbpresent/files
Looking at the most recent build, it looks like the circleci only ran py2.7, anyway:
https://circleci.com/gh/conda-forge/nbpresent-feedstock/4
Any thoughts, @ocefpaf @jakirkham?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: