From f48421bcb175688ce9022210cfa412e167f99626 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: conda-bot <18747875+conda-bot@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 16:05:30 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?=F0=9F=94=84=20synced=20file(s)=20with=20conda/?= =?UTF-8?q?infrastructure=20(#4988)?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Co-authored-by: Conda Bot --- HOW_WE_USE_GITHUB.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/HOW_WE_USE_GITHUB.md b/HOW_WE_USE_GITHUB.md index aa5a3691c6..dc32be1cf1 100644 --- a/HOW_WE_USE_GITHUB.md +++ b/HOW_WE_USE_GITHUB.md @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ please post details to the [Nucleus forums](https://community.anaconda.cloud/). 
 Hi [@username],
 
-Thanks for voicing your concern about the performance of our dependency solver. To fix this, our official recommendation is using the "conda-libmamba-solver" instead of the default "classic" solver (more information about the "conda-libmamba-solver" can be found here: https://conda.github.io/conda-libmamba-solver/getting-started/).
+Thanks for voicing your concern about the performance of the classic dependency solver. To fix this, our official recommendation is using the new default "conda-libmamba-solver" instead of the classic solver (more information about the "conda-libmamba-solver" can be found here: https://conda.github.io/conda-libmamba-solver/getting-started/).
 
 In most cases "conda-libmamba-solver" should be significantly faster than the "classic" solver. We hope it provides you with a much better experience going forward.