Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[APM] Improve error message on Service Overview Page #50170

Closed
sorenlouv opened this issue Nov 11, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

[APM] Improve error message on Service Overview Page #50170

sorenlouv opened this issue Nov 11, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New value added to drive a business result Team:APM All issues that need APM UI Team support

Comments

@sorenlouv
Copy link
Member

To use APM app the user needs to have read permissions to apm-* indices and general access to the APM app.
If the user lacks read permissions to apm-* they'll currently see an error toast but nothing that helps them understand what went wrong.

Solution
Let the user know which permissions they lack, and how they can get them. Perhaps with a screenshot or gif of the User Management screen and/or a direct link to User Management (although the user in question probably does not have permissions to give themselves access - the link it might still useful so they know where to point someone else).

@sorenlouv sorenlouv added [zube]: Inbox enhancement New value added to drive a business result Team:APM All issues that need APM UI Team support labels Nov 11, 2019
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/apm-ui (Team:apm)

@formgeist
Copy link
Contributor

@sqren I already opened #50052 - does that cover the same thing?

@sorenlouv
Copy link
Member Author

I thought I saw this somewhere but didn't see it on our board. Should've looked in design. Closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New value added to drive a business result Team:APM All issues that need APM UI Team support
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants