Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Timeout Issue #61

Closed
Sicks3c opened this issue Oct 6, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Timeout Issue #61

Sicks3c opened this issue Oct 6, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Sicks3c
Copy link

Sicks3c commented Oct 6, 2020

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

When you fuzz you need the most confortable output in order to analyze the results
When the request timeout it's shows in the output without any -v used

Describe the solution you'd like
I would like if possible a flag to supress this timeout urls and leave only the status code and useful information in the output

Screenshot
githubissue

@Sicks3c Sicks3c added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 6, 2020
@epi052
Copy link
Owner

epi052 commented Oct 6, 2020

ill take a look at this tonight

@epi052
Copy link
Owner

epi052 commented Oct 6, 2020

@amiralkizaru

A few things here.

  1. your screenshot doesn't show a timeout, were you seeing timeouts?
  2. if, on another scan, you were getting a bunch of timeouts, it's probably indicative that you should use a fewer number of threads to scan, i.e. -t 25

With that being said, I'm ok with logging timeouts as a warning, but leaving other errors (like a Connection Refused, as shown in your screenshot) logged as errors.

That means that timeouts can be seen with a -v, but won't be seen without it. Actual errors still can only be suppressed with -q.

You can take a look at the changes here #62

Let me know what you think

@epi052
Copy link
Owner

epi052 commented Oct 7, 2020

closed in 4b4af5a

@epi052 epi052 closed this as completed Oct 7, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants