Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check initial pressure in the Norne model #375

Closed
wouterjdb opened this issue Apr 1, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by equinor/flownet-testdata#44
Closed

Check initial pressure in the Norne model #375

wouterjdb opened this issue Apr 1, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by equinor/flownet-testdata#44
Assignees
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed invalid This doesn't seem right question Further information is requested

Comments

@wouterjdb
Copy link
Contributor

Ref discussion here: #372

Check that we use the correct initial pressure in all regions.

@wouterjdb wouterjdb added help wanted Extra attention is needed invalid This doesn't seem right question Further information is requested labels Apr 1, 2021
@edubarrosTNO
Copy link
Contributor

I have checked this today: there is an inconsistency between the equilibration settings of region 4 in the config file and in the EQUIL keyword of the reference Norne simulation.
https://github.com/equinor/flownet-testdata/blob/48e4273b04ee33c2643e6d07acf9291fd50caf8f/norne/config/assisted_history_matching.yml#L187-L191

      - id: 4
        datum_depth: 2200
        datum_pressure:
          min: 260
          max: 280
EQUIL
   (...)
   2200.0  236.92  2400.00  0.0  2200.00  0.0  4  0  0  /  G: Ile-Tilje
   (...)

@edubarrosTNO
Copy link
Contributor

I will fix it in a PR tomorrow, with:

      - id: 4
        datum_depth: 2200
        datum_pressure:
          min: 230
          max: 250

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed invalid This doesn't seem right question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants