Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Watch balances of bitcoin addresses without needing the private key #40

Open
omegamormegil opened this issue Jan 12, 2013 · 12 comments

Comments

@omegamormegil
Copy link

I'd like to be able to include the balance from bitcoin addresses in my Armory BTC total without the need to use the private key.

This would be useful for watching the balance sent to a paper wallet or from a Casascius coin where I don't want to use (or don't have access to yet in the case of Casascius coins) the private key.

Currently, it looks like I can create a watching only wallet, which sounds like it would work, but I don't see a way to do this without using the private key on the offline computer. At the moment, the best way I know to do this is to check a balance by looking up the address on Blockchain.info.

If there is already a way to do this in Armory, I'd love to know how.

@yhaenggi
Copy link

etotheipi told me this will be possible with the new wallets format.

@stevenroose
Copy link

There is a question about this request on the Bitcoin SE here: http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/10473/how-can-i-import-public-keys-into-armory

@leo-bogert
Copy link

I'm voting for this. There currently seems to be NO bitcoin client which supports creating a watch-only wallet from scratch.
Its fine that armory supports creating watch-only wallets from its own wallets. But that doesn't help you have been using the official bitcoind/bitcoin-qt for years and want to watch your bitcoind/bitcoin-qt wallets with armory without exporting the private keys.

@juancho64
Copy link

I've developed an app which allows you to easily see and organize your balances and convert them to many currencies at different market prices:

www.wonderwallets.com.ar

@stp-ip
Copy link

stp-ip commented May 26, 2014

Any update on tracking public addresses?

@goatpig
Copy link
Collaborator

goatpig commented May 26, 2014

We're in the process of developing a new wallet format, notably integrate BIP32 support. This kind of features will have to added after the new format is in place.

@goatpig goatpig closed this as completed May 26, 2014
@goatpig goatpig reopened this May 26, 2014
@stp-ip
Copy link

stp-ip commented May 26, 2014

Any ETA on the new wallet format, which includes new deterministic wallets I assume and finally the ability to import compressed private keys?

@goatpig
Copy link
Collaborator

goatpig commented May 26, 2014

It will have stuff like compressed keys and unicode comments, yes.

As for the ETA, I can tell you its our goal to release it for 0.92, can't tell you much about when though. Expect at least a few months.

@stp-ip
Copy link

stp-ip commented May 26, 2014

Ok this will then correlate with multisig support too. Hurry up I wanna clean up my keys/setup ;)

@stp-ip
Copy link

stp-ip commented Jul 11, 2014

Is the latest unstable testing version already mostly the 0.92 version? As there are still most features missing you were talking about @goatpig compressed addr. imports, deterministic wallets for lockboxes, watch-only wallets not just for armory. etc.

@goatpig
Copy link
Collaborator

goatpig commented Jul 11, 2014

0.92 is a "smaller" release exclusively for lockboxes. The features you are talking about aren't ready yet and won't make into this one. Most of them will be part of 0.93. The pace and nature of releases has changed since we have 5 full time developers: quicker releases with less features.

We could have released lockboxes a couple months from now with the rest of all this stuff we're working on, but why wait when it's ready to go?

@goatpig goatpig closed this as completed Jul 11, 2014
@goatpig goatpig reopened this Jul 11, 2014
@stp-ip
Copy link

stp-ip commented Jul 11, 2014

Ok great to hear. Already tested the lockboxes and besides the non polished gui and non deterministic addresses +1.
So a couple months for this feature and the rest.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants