Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 23, 2020. It is now read-only.

search.py:29-31: Implement search by option. Return back... #493

Open
0pdd opened this issue Mar 11, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

search.py:29-31: Implement search by option. Return back... #493

0pdd opened this issue Mar 11, 2019 · 4 comments
Assignees
@duker33
Labels
1 hour typical issue size. It's one pdd hour. Performer should spend about one astronomical hour for this i 2 performer can implement issue at his closest convenient time blocked issue is blocked by another issue Product options feature Search Search and Autocomplete feature

Comments

@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator

0pdd commented Mar 11, 2019

The puzzle 483-bd5c387d from #483 has to be resolved:

stroyprombeton/stroyprombeton/views/search.py

Lines 29 to 31 in bc0f7a6

# @todo #483:60m Implement search by option.
# Return back searching by `option.specification` field.
# And test it of course.

The puzzle was created by @duker33 on 11-Mar-19.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.
@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

0pdd commented Mar 11, 2019

@artemiyds2 @duker33 please pay attention to this new issue.

0pdd referenced this issue Mar 11, 2019
@duker33
#483 #455 Move data from product fields to options and tags (#487)
bc0f7a6 
* #483  Draft for options and tags creation

* #483  Create options and tags

* #455  Rm data fields from Product and Option models

* #483  Review#1 fix. Move custom data migrations to RunPython

* #483  Adapt search to new DB structure

* #483  Review#1. Move product grouping to func, bind tags to options

* #483  Adapt fixtures to the new DB scheme

* #455  Fix tests

* #455  Skip some tests. Create pdd issues for them

* #483  Group products by name+category_id in migrations

* #455  Skip problem test to prevent fatal traceback in output

* #483  Make some operations bulk and atomic

* #483  Add missed pdd issues

* #483  Return back the state of temporary files

* #483  Review#3 fix

* #483  Grade refarm dep to 0.5.0

* #483  Move slug creating logic to migrations

* #483  Tests minor fixes

* #483  Skip several fallen tests
@0pdd 0pdd mentioned this issue Mar 11, 2019
Closed
@duker33
Copy link
Contributor

duker33 commented Mar 12, 2019

waits #494 to decide how we'll design product specifications

@duker33 duker33 added 1 hour typical issue size. It's one pdd hour. Performer should spend about one astronomical hour for this i 2 performer can implement issue at his closest convenient time blocked issue is blocked by another issue Product options feature take it any teammate can take this issue and start working with it labels Mar 12, 2019
@duker33 duker33 added Series feature Product options feature and removed Product options feature blocked issue is blocked by another issue labels May 14, 2019
@duker33 duker33 self-assigned this May 14, 2019
@duker33 duker33 added Search Search and Autocomplete feature and removed take it any teammate can take this issue and start working with it Series feature labels May 14, 2019
@duker33
Copy link
Contributor

duker33 commented May 17, 2019

depends on #652

@duker33
Copy link
Contributor

duker33 commented Jun 6, 2019

depends on fidals/refarm-site#337

@duker33 duker33 added the blocked issue is blocked by another issue label Jun 6, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@duker33 duker33

Labels
1 hour typical issue size. It's one pdd hour. Performer should spend about one astronomical hour for this i 2 performer can implement issue at his closest convenient time blocked issue is blocked by another issue Product options feature Search Search and Autocomplete feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@duker33 @0pdd