response schema provided as a sapmle and actual api output is differnt

[githubofkrishnadhas]

Code of Conduct

• I have read and agree to the GitHub Docs project's Code of Conduct

What article on docs.github.com is affected?

i was going through https://docs.github.com/en/rest/repos/repos?apiVersion=2022-11-28#list-organization-repositories

i was doing an automation on enabling codeql analysis on repos https://docs.github.com/en/rest/code-scanning/code-scanning?apiVersion=2022-11-28, which are not enabled. for that i was running repositories api first to check for the repo dependabot, secret scanning are enabled or not.

i see the sample api response back like

`
"security_and_analysis": {
"advanced_security": {
"status": "enabled"
},
"secret_scanning": {
"status": "enabled"
},
"secret_scanning_push_protection": {
"status": "disabled"
}
}

`
but the actual response getting back is differnt

"security_and_analysis": { "secret_scanning": { "status": "disabled" }, "secret_scanning_push_protection": { "status": "disabled" }, "dependabot_security_updates": { "status": "disabled" }, "secret_scanning_validity_checks": { "status": "disabled" } }

i donot see this "advanced_security": { "status": "enabled" }, instead , "secret_scanning_validity_checks": { "status": "disabled" }, "secret_scanning": { "status": "disabled" }, are available. I urge you to adjust these as these can mislead developers.

What part(s) of the article would you like to see updated?

Please make necessary changes on the response section

• example response
• response schema

Additional information

Hope the above details are good enough.

[docs-bot]

Thank you for opening this issue! Updates to this documentation must be made internally. I have copied your issue to an internal issue, so I will close this issue.

[nguyenalex836]

@githubofkrishnadhas Thank you for submitting this issue, and raising a flag on this! ✨ This portion of the documentation will need to be fixed internally. I've created an internal issue for our team to review, and will close out this issue 💛

[githubofkrishnadhas]

Thanks.i would be happy if you can add the issue id on pr 😉