-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Harbor replicating harbor-core cause bearer token is not valid yet error in helm installation #18971
Comments
Is it the situation same to this issue? #18880 |
Yes same isssue with that ticket id for values.yaml I only changes the areas which ares shown blow: set the service account to be used, default if left emptyserviceAccountName: "" mount the service account tokenautomountServiceAccountToken: false Startup probe valuesstartupProbe:
|
This issue is being marked stale due to a period of inactivity. If this issue is still relevant, please comment or remove the stale label. Otherwise, this issue will close in 30 days. |
still open |
FWIW, I'm no longer seeing this issue after changing from a harbor-operator managed instance of harbor v2.5.4 to harbor v2.9.0 deployed via the helm chart. Can now run more than one replica of harbor-core without getting authentication errors. |
This issue is being marked stale due to a period of inactivity. If this issue is still relevant, please comment or remove the stale label. Otherwise, this issue will close in 30 days. |
This issue was closed because it has been stalled for 30 days with no activity. If this issue is still relevant, please re-open a new issue. |
Hello when we deploy harbor registry with helm , we set the replica number to two,after that in another harbor instance (outside of the kubernetes cluster,) we try push base replication the error is 401 unauthorized access,and remote harbor registry state became unhealty after when we examined both harbor-core pods one of them is working fine in other pod the error occured "bearer token is not valid yet"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: