-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Should tasks inherit the branch
flag
#51
Comments
Implementation at 3536ee7 - needs tests |
@phated So, the idea is to use the branch property to make decisions about error propagation and log level, have I got that right? I added the flag to be selective about when to do I don't see how it would functionally wrong to have tasks "inherit" this property from their function (although I might not call it that)... But I didn't have a lot of time playing around with it. With the Maybe it's just me but if I run I'm not too familiar with error propagation, but wouldn't it be pretty easy to just mark an error as having been logged, and not printing it again in that case? That way you could separate error propagation from error logging. |
@erikkemperman Yeah, I agree that running |
@phated Not at a computer atm, but just a thought: maybe pass along |
Or, now looking at your |
@erikkemperman I'm going to close this. I've come up with a better way to handle the error propagation and I'm only going to filter the |
@phated sounds good to me! |
@erikkemperman
I am taking a look at implementing gulpjs/gulp#1411 (comment) and gulpjs/gulp#1330 through the use of the
branch
flag you added to the metadata (awesome idea, btw). However, when we do something like the following, that flag isn't attached to the metadata for the new task.Do you think that the task should inherit the branch flag if we already have metadata and the metadata tells us it is a branch?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: