Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: BCPs can normatively cite all other standards levels #6530

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 26, 2023

Conversation

larseggert
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #6524

ietf/doc/models.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 25, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #6530 (089690b) into main (f6a2d8c) will increase coverage by 0.15%.
Report is 40 commits behind head on main.
The diff coverage is 94.73%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6530      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.70%   88.86%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files         290      284       -6     
  Lines       40440    40253     -187     
==========================================
- Hits        35874    35770     -104     
+ Misses       4566     4483      -83     
Files Coverage Δ
ietf/doc/views_conflict_review.py 97.05% <100.00%> (-0.07%) ⬇️
ietf/secr/meetings/forms.py 89.33% <ø> (+0.16%) ⬆️
ietf/secr/meetings/urls.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
ietf/secr/meetings/views.py 83.57% <100.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️
ietf/secr/urls.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
ietf/submit/parsers/base.py 96.72% <100.00%> (+1.56%) ⬆️
ietf/submit/parsers/xml_parser.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
ietf/utils/xmldraft.py 93.18% <100.00%> (+0.26%) ⬆️
ietf/submit/forms.py 79.10% <80.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️
ietf/doc/models.py 89.20% <90.47%> (+0.22%) ⬆️
... and 1 more

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

@rjsparks rjsparks merged commit 6d87279 into ietf-tools:main Oct 26, 2023
9 checks passed
@larseggert larseggert deleted the fix=6524 branch October 26, 2023 04:08
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 30, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Logic to indicate downrefs from BCPs appears broken
2 participants