Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add description of handling years in periods #112

Open
ClaraLuisa opened this issue Sep 12, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Add description of handling years in periods #112

ClaraLuisa opened this issue Sep 12, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
docs Documentation

Comments

@ClaraLuisa
Copy link
Contributor

It would be great to have some explanation added to the messageix documentation on the handling of the years in periods. e.g. an explanation as given by @danielhuppmann in the hackathon chanell:

The period 700 includes the years [691, .. , 700] . Thus the duration_period_sum(year1, year2) parameter counts the number of years from the first year of period year1 to the first year of period year2
including the first year when counting. So duration_period_sum(689, 720) goes from January 1, 689 until December 31, 710, which is 22 years.

@khaeru
Copy link
Member

khaeru commented Aug 17, 2020

Thanks to @DIUANA for flagging this in #385. For the record, I added a new documentation page describing year and period concepts, while finishing off #286. The current version is here. It probably could be expanded to describe these other parameters, or we could choose very precise and consistent wording in the tables that are inline with the GAMS code.

@DIUANA
Copy link

DIUANA commented Aug 18, 2020

Many thanks @khaeru. It is important to have a clear documentation for the period related parameters. As I told in #385 it is necessary to align all these definitions. Atm I am in doubt if there is a mistake in the parameters definition or if I am misunderstanding them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants