Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

go-ipfs should be able to mount /ipfs separately from /ipns. #3563

Closed
vi opened this issue Jan 5, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

go-ipfs should be able to mount /ipfs separately from /ipns. #3563

vi opened this issue Jan 5, 2017 · 4 comments
Labels
help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature topic/commands Topic commands topic/fuse Topic fuse

Comments

@vi
Copy link

vi commented Jan 5, 2017

Version information:

go-ipfs version: 0.4.4-
Repo version: 4
System version: amd64/linux
Golang version: go1.7

Type: Enhancement

Priority:

P2 or P3

Description:

IPNS seems to be more problematic compared to basic IPFS layer. It requires connection to internet, it expires. IPFS may be used without IPNS.

Yet there is no option to mount only /ipfs, without /ipns.

First attempt:

  "Mounts": {
    "IPFS": "/home/vi/home/ipfs/ipfs",
    "IPNS__commented_out": "/home/vi/home/ipfs/ipns",
    "FuseAllowOther": true
  },

Result:

Error: Could not resolve name. despite of I assumed that moving away "IPNS" mount parameter should disable that mout.

Second attempt: ipfs mount

~/ipfs becomes available for a moment (while it is trying to resolve node's name). Then it quits with Error: Could not resolve name. and ~/ipfs becomes unmounted again.

Expected something like ipfs mount --disable-ipns or "Mounts": { "DisableIPNS": true }.

Ideally I should also be option to do further independent ipfs mount --only-ipns to deliver optional /ipns part later.

/ipfs, unlike /ipns may be used by something serious, be available at boot time (before network configured).

@eminence
Copy link
Contributor

eminence commented Jan 5, 2017

CC #2167

@whyrusleeping
Copy link
Member

Definitely agreed, lets do this. It should be configurable through the CLI and we should be able to have a config setting for it.

@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping added kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature topic/fuse Topic fuse help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue topic/commands Topic commands labels Jan 5, 2017
@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping added this to the Ipfs 0.4.12 milestone Sep 2, 2017
@Kubuxu Kubuxu modified the milestones: Ipfs 0.4.12, go-ipfs 0.4.13 Nov 6, 2017
@Mikaela
Copy link
Contributor

Mikaela commented Mar 26, 2019

Is this a duplicate of #2187?

@Stebalien
Copy link
Member

Yes. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature topic/commands Topic commands topic/fuse Topic fuse
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants