-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RefCall vs. PASS #160
Comments
|
It seems to be not a homozygous position in IGV (A in green and T in red). I checked a couple of other refcall positions and they also look similarly. Is it because some reads were filtered due to bad quality? or maybe I used "--pepper_min_coverage_threshold 20" so one allele could be considered as homozygous if alt is supported by <20 reads? |
There are a variety of things that go into the determination of a site being a true variant or not. Including base_quality, mapping_quality, strand_distribution etc. What it means here is the DeepVariant looked at this site and decided it is not a variant. The |
Hi,
I am not sure why some positions are considered as "refcall", which indicates the "call is homozygous". When I checked the position in IGV, it seems that it is a heterozygous position. I was wondering how refcall is different from PASS. For example:
NODE_10237_length_5294_cov_2.741049 216 . A AT 17 PASS . GT:GQ:DP:AD:VAF:C 0/1:17:36:12:0.333:P NODE_10237_length_5294_cov_2.741049 239 . T A 0 refCall . GT:GQ:DP:AD:VAF:C 0/0:21:36:11:0.305556:DV
I am new to VCF files so maybe I didn't understand the format correctly. Could you please help me to clarify this? Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: