Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Project reactor support #1

Open
migroskub opened this issue Jun 3, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Project reactor support #1

migroskub opened this issue Jun 3, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@migroskub
Copy link

I’d like to understand whether this project supports and implements the bindings asynchronously with project reactor, or whether it uses synchronous interaction with Pulsar.

@lhotari
Copy link
Owner

lhotari commented Jun 4, 2022

This binder is in early phases and there isn't yet support for Project Reactor.

There's a separate project https://github.com/datastax/reactive-pulsar which contains an Project Reactor / Reactive Streams adapter for the Apache Pulsar Java client. Later on, this could be used to provide reactive support.

Would you like to share your use case for using Project Reactor with this binder? Any specific examples of what type of support you would need for your use case?

@migroskub
Copy link
Author

@lhotari I'm using reactive-pulsar already and that's great. The thing is that I'd like to use spring cloud stream but I can't since it doesn't have an available binder for reactive-pulsar yet.
A binder for Pulsar is cool and I'd be glad to hear that it exists, but I won't use it since that's not async by nature.

If there'll be a pulsar-spring-cloud-stream-binder-reactive, this will fit my needs and I'll gladly use it.

@lhotari
Copy link
Owner

lhotari commented Jun 17, 2022

Thanks for the feedback @migroskub . I'll take that into consideration.

@dajemet379
Copy link

@lhotari I'd also like that. Reactor is more efficient and widely used when it comes to data pipelines

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants