Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Everything is broken (Finish refactoring Mailpile) #127

Closed
BjarniRunar opened this issue Aug 27, 2013 · 6 comments
Closed

Everything is broken (Finish refactoring Mailpile) #127

BjarniRunar opened this issue Aug 27, 2013 · 6 comments

Comments

@BjarniRunar
Copy link
Member

As stated in the current README, the Mailpile code base is in the middle of being refactored. This bug is a place-holder catch-all bug for any problems caused by the refactoring: we know, and we will fix it as soon as we have time!

Generally speaking, we are not interested in bug reports about things being broken at this point in time. We know, it's all broken, mostly deliberately because we are in the process of restructuring the code.

Please understand that us aggressively closing bugs related to this is nothing personal, we are just trying to reduce the noise a bit. :-)

@danx0r
Copy link
Contributor

danx0r commented Aug 27, 2013

Fair enough, sorry I didn't quite get that the refactoring meant these sorts of reports are redundant.

@shartte
Copy link
Contributor

shartte commented Sep 14, 2013

What are your plans for the WWW UI? Are you going to start using a microframework for the web part (i.e. Flask or similar), or will you stick to using a custom one? Using something WSGI compatible would be very nice since mailpile could then efficiently be run behind something like nginx.

@ulikoehler
Copy link
Contributor

@shartte In another pull request @BjarniRunar told me he wanted to keep dependencies as minimal as possible. I think this is the right way to go, because standalone packaging will be way easier that way.

@liliakai
Copy link

I'm getting the "global name '_' is not defined" error from #267. Is there a last-known-good revision for people just trying to get up and running?

@BjarniRunar
Copy link
Member Author

Some thing are no longer broken. :-)

@ulikoehler
Copy link
Contributor

@shartte Just to mention, MP can run behind nginx anyway, because you can simply run MP on e.g. port 33411 and configure nginx as an reverse proxy for it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment