Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sn-wcdeq, 19.8aw #4251

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

sn-wcdeq, 19.8aw #4251

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

icecream17
Copy link
Contributor

@icecream17 icecream17 commented Sep 27, 2024

Resolves #4158

The changes are rather disjoint but it's small (+146-147, +18, +2-2) and gets rid of 3 misc todos.

df-resub $a |- -R = ( x e. RR , y e. RR |->
( iota_ z e. RR ( y + z ) = x ) ) $.
$}

${
$d x y z A $. $d x y z B $.
$( Value of real subtraction, which is the (unique) real ` x ` such that
` B + x = A ` . (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2022.) $)
` B + x = A ` . (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2023.) $)
resubval $p |- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR ) ->
( A -R B ) = ( iota_ x e. RR ( B + x ) = A ) ) $=
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The proof is still very long. Maybe some theorems/lemmas can be extracted.

@@ -646216,6 +646216,13 @@ D Fn ( I ... ( M - 1 ) ) /\
( cvv cv wnel cab wcel vex elirrv nelir 2th abbi2i eqcomi ) BACZMDZAENABMBF
NAGMMAHIJKL $.

$( Alternative to ~ wcdeq and ~ df-cdeq . This flattens the syntax
representation ( wi ( weq vx vy ) wph ) to ( wcdeqALT vx vy wph ),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
representation ( wi ( weq vx vy ) wph ) to ( wcdeqALT vx vy wph ),
representation ( wi ( weq vx vy ) wph ) to ( sn-wcdeq vx vy wph ),

?

@@ -646216,6 +646216,13 @@ D Fn ( I ... ( M - 1 ) ) /\
( cvv cv wnel cab wcel vex elirrv nelir 2th abbi2i eqcomi ) BACZMDZAENABMBF
NAGMMAHIJKL $.

$( Alternative to ~ wcdeq and ~ df-cdeq . This flattens the syntax
representation ( wi ( weq vx vy ) wph ) to ( wcdeqALT vx vy wph ),
accomplishing the stated purpose of ~ df-cleq . (Contributed by SN,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That does not really accomplish the purpose of df-cdeq (BTW, you wrote "df-cleq"). You could say it "illustrates the comment of df-cdeq". Overall, I find this theorem of dubious interest.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It accomplishes what df-cdeq says it accomplishes: flattening the syntax tree

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

df-cdeq
3 participants