-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 340
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature request: Nonpersistent containers #2303
Comments
While I think overall it would be a huge benefit to everyone if MAC and Temporary Containers got unified, if I understand you correctly you can do this in TC currently: auto on, global isolation off and just use per-domain isolation configuration. Is there something that this does not handle for you? |
It sounds like something that would work. But ... I have no idea how to configure TC so I can't verify it works the way I'd like it to. |
Closing in favor of #929. |
Feature request
The option to make containers nonpersistent, or at least one default container that is nonpersistent.
Then you just specify that you want this site to always use a container that does not have persistent storage.
Options in behaviour I'd appreciate:
But honestly. I'd settle with only the first or the 2nd option.
Why
This is the usecase I am imagining is primarily online banking, but it'd be good for anything you want boxed of and don't want site data stored of. Honestly, any site you would currently use private mode for currently, with the benefit that you don't need to remember to open something in private mode.
The options that kinda do what my request would do:
Alternatives to my suggestion that would also work
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: