Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mobile Device Management (MDM) Integration Features for the Enterprise #154

Closed
b1ggjoe opened this issue Jun 19, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed
Labels
1. to develop Accepted and waiting to be taken care of enhancement Nice to have

Comments

@b1ggjoe
Copy link

b1ggjoe commented Jun 19, 2016

@LukasReschke and Team,

Following up on a 'closed' issue here: #144

Since we're looking at bringing some of the more 'Enterprise' features to Nextcloud, what about the topic of integrating with MDM or Mobile Device Management platforms such as:

  • VMware AirWatch
  • LANDESK Mobility
  • Symantec Mobile Management Suite

Within the circles that I travel, I work with MANY Enterprise customers (Commercial, Education, Government, you name it).

One of the single most important topics that they have to deal with is BYOD strategies. Many organizations are having a difficult time on whether to provide 'company-issued' mobile devices and/or provide the venue for employees to bring their own smart phones or tablets and provide a way to allow them to leverage their devices to access and utilize company data.

The largest single fear, is how to safeguard and secure company data from employees who leave the company and so forth.

One File, Sync and Share platform that targets the Enterprise market and who I've personally worked with, is a company and product called: Syncplicity.

As an example, this is one of their touted features: https://www.syncplicity.com/features/

They have two categories: Users and For IT.

Under For IT, you'll find a whole host of Enterprise features, as an example.

However 'MDM' integration is by far one of the more popular and most important to the Enterprise landscape.

Just my thoughts.

BJ.

@MariusBluem MariusBluem changed the title [FEATURE REQUEST] Mobile Device Management (MDM) Integration Features for the Enterprise Mobile Device Management (MDM) Integration Features for the Enterprise Jun 19, 2016
@Spacefish
Copy link
Member

Guess the main feature would be provisioning of the app, so the user does not have to login / know the URL of the Nextcloud installation. Maybe this is easily possible, with existing MDM systems, by just reading a file in the app if no configuration is present and thereby provisioning the app. The MDM system just has to push the .apk package and write a file with the url and credentials to the /sdcard ?!

@jasonbayton
Copy link
Member

It would be good to know what "Mobile device management integration with AirWatch, MobileIron, and Good Dynamics" means in practice. SSO? invidiual app policy via an SDK?

Agree with @Spacefish though, ability to prepopulate the NC server address and user credentials via LDAP shortcodes ($userid$, $emailaddress$, etc) would be super nifty; as too would sharing controls. MobileIron for example allows for the restriction of open-in or copy-to via app-connect policies the app would have to be compatible with:

regio55n

Good on the other hand being a container solution can control this without app modification to only allow sharing and opening with other apps in the container.

@oparoz
Copy link
Member

oparoz commented Jun 27, 2016

I think this topic is still too broad. It's not too complicated to deploy a NC client to a container and apply some restrictions on sharing outside of it, etc., that's something that any company could do using the most popular platforms. The NC client is just another app on the work side. Also, the best EMM suites comes with EFSS, so is there really a need to replace that instead of making sure both systems can communicate?

For businesses using a pure MDM solution, it seems that most of the interesting features of Syncplicity, will be available in the web GUI at some point, so once the logic is in place, it shouldn't be too difficult to implement the client side in the mobile apps. I would open separate feature requests in those repositories with links to the same requests opened in the server repo.

@nextcloud-bot nextcloud-bot added the stale Ticket or PR with no recent activity label Jun 20, 2018
@skjnldsv skjnldsv added the 1. to develop Accepted and waiting to be taken care of label Jun 12, 2019
@ghost ghost removed the stale Ticket or PR with no recent activity label Jun 12, 2019
@szaimen

This comment has been minimized.

@szaimen szaimen closed this as completed May 21, 2021
@szaimen szaimen reopened this May 27, 2021
@CarlSchwan
Copy link
Member

I will close this since there doesn't seem to be a lot of interest and no response for around 2 years. Please reopen if you still want to implement this. PR are still welcome :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1. to develop Accepted and waiting to be taken care of enhancement Nice to have
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants