You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a summary of discussions regarding this topic so far, and should serve as a tracking issue for further information:
We eventually want to transition to the ARC RO-Crate Profile being a first-class citizen in the ARCtrl stack. Currently, it is only an export-target without a dedicated data model.
Our aim is to add a second data model that represents the ARC as it's RO-Crate profile alongside the current ARCtrl data model. The current data model has three separate fields, representing the ISA, CWL, and FileSystem parts of the ARC, while the RO-Crate profile will unify these concepts, and therefore be a prime target for e.g. optimized query models.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a summary of discussions regarding this topic so far, and should serve as a tracking issue for further information:
We eventually want to transition to the ARC RO-Crate Profile being a first-class citizen in the ARCtrl stack. Currently, it is only an export-target without a dedicated data model.
Our aim is to add a second data model that represents the ARC as it's RO-Crate profile alongside the current ARCtrl data model. The current data model has three separate fields, representing the
ISA
,CWL
, andFileSystem
parts of the ARC, while the RO-Crate profile will unify these concepts, and therefore be a prime target for e.g. optimized query models.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: