Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

it is reasonable? #4

Open
bringtree opened this issue May 19, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

it is reasonable? #4

bringtree opened this issue May 19, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@bringtree
Copy link

bringtree commented May 19, 2018

update_term = gradient_updates[word] / (update_count[word])

I think that the count should be split to 3 types[AR,SA,VSP] to compute.
Then the k1,k2,k3 weight can be work effectivity.

@lshowway
Copy link

lshowway commented Aug 2, 2019

@bringtree I agree with you, the update_term may be not reasonably computed。
do you know why the partial derivative is as follows?
gradient = u * dot(u,v) - v

@bringtree
Copy link
Author

@lshowway

The vector had been done normalization.
It is a unit vector。

@lshowway
Copy link

@lshowway

The vector had been done normalization.
It is a unit vector。

Thank you. But, why the partial derivative is as follows?
gradient = u * dot(u,v) - v

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants