Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

no-loop implementation #141

Open
pablotdl opened this issue Feb 17, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

no-loop implementation #141

pablotdl opened this issue Feb 17, 2015 · 3 comments
Milestone

Comments

@pablotdl
Copy link

Hi,

would it be possible to implement the no-loop clause in the DSL so that a rule is not re evaluated as a consequence of its RHS expression modifying the facts?

That'd simplify rule creation a great deal for some use cases.

Thanks in advance.

@markbjerke
Copy link

I am in the process of submitting a pull request that implements no-loop.

@pablotdl
Copy link
Author

Excellent!

@DevSide DevSide added this to the v0.5.0 milestone Oct 5, 2016
@DevSide
Copy link
Collaborator

DevSide commented Nov 6, 2016

#214

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants