Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

/proc/fs/nfsd being flagged as an NFS share #807

Closed
brianjmurrell opened this issue Jan 18, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

/proc/fs/nfsd being flagged as an NFS share #807

brianjmurrell opened this issue Jan 18, 2022 · 5 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@brianjmurrell
Copy link
Contributor

is (incorrectly, IMHO) flagging nfsd /proc/fs/nfsd nfsd rw,relatime 0 0 as an NFS share and inhibiting upgrade:

Risk Factor: high (inhibitor)
Title: Use of NFS detected. Upgrade can't proceed
Summary: NFS is currently not supported by the inplace upgrade.
We have found NFS usage at the following locations:
- Currently mounted NFS share:
nfsd /proc/fs/nfsd nfsd rw,relatime

Remediation: [hint] Disable NFS temporarily for the upgrade if possible.
Key: 9881b25faceeeaa7a6478bcdac29afd7f6baaaed

As an aside, the line above showing the NFS mount that is being flagged is added by #806.

@pirat89 pirat89 added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Jan 18, 2022
@pirat89
Copy link
Member

pirat89 commented Jan 18, 2022

Hi @brianjmurrell. thank you for the report and improved logging. We are already aware about this issue and we are keeping it for now as good simple issue for our newcomer (in Feb). It's definitely one of things we want to deliver in the next release. However in case of need, PRs are always welcomed, we have more good first issues in our list :)

@brianjmurrell
Copy link
Contributor Author

Probably looking for in ['nfs3', 'nfs4'] is a decent solution. More future proof perhaps might be an RE match against /nfs[3-9]/ although that is a bit presumptive. :-)

@pirat89
Copy link
Member

pirat89 commented Jan 19, 2022

@brianjmurrell Exactly something like that is expected fix :) In case of the list, I am not sure whether it's possible to have a type like nfs4.2 or whether specification of particular "minor" version is possible just through additional options like vers=4.2. Anyway, definitely we will check that NFS severs will not be automatically blocked for upgrades.

@pirat89
Copy link
Member

pirat89 commented Jan 19, 2022

For the tracking when this is fixed in RHEL:

The known workaround in the meanwhile

# systemctl stop /proc/fs/nfsd

@pirat89 pirat89 added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 21, 2022
@pirat89
Copy link
Member

pirat89 commented Mar 7, 2023

This has been already fixed in release v0.17.0 - PR #888

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants