We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi,
I see several terms where the labels looks like this. Are the labels intentional?
name: Hadjikhani et al. (1998) visuotopic area V8 synonym: "Hadjikhani et al. (1998) visuotopic area v8" EXACT [BIRNLEX:4061] synonym: "Hadjikhani et al. (1998) visuotopic area v8" EXACT HUMAN_PREFERRED [BIRNLEX:4061] xref: BIRNLEX:4061 is_a: UBERON:0026765 {source="NIFSTD"} ! Hadjikhani et al. (1998) visuotopic partition scheme region [Term] id: UBERON:0028412 name: Ongur, Price, and Ferry (2003) area 10p synonym: "ongur, price, and ferry (2003) area 10p" EXACT [BIRNLEX:4067] synonym: "ongur, price, and ferry (2003) area 10p" EXACT HUMAN_PREFERRED [BIRNLEX:4067] xref: BIRNLEX:4067 is_a: UBERON:0026777 {source="NIFSTD"} ! Ongur, Price, and Ferry (2003) prefrontal cortical partition scheme region
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
yes they are. these came from birnlex which is a predecessor of nifstd.
ideally you could just follow the provenance on the synonyms and find out more... but doubt birnlex is even resolvable any more.
@tgbugs @dosumis what should we do here?
We need to flatten the provenance chain for these as
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Hi,
I see several terms where the labels looks like this. Are the labels intentional?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: