You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
ocaml/opam#2724 overhauled the handling of package atoms, but there appears to have been a slight error with the handling of the + character. This wouldn't have been a detectable issue in 2016, and I expect the primary motivation was the single + used in versions for variants, but we now have conf-c++ and conf-g++ in opam-repository, and it's not possible to refer to their boolean variables in the natural syntax:
ocaml/opam#2724 overhauled the handling of package atoms, but there appears to have been a slight error with the handling of the
+
character. This wouldn't have been a detectable issue in 2016, and I expect the primary motivation was the single+
used in versions for variants, but we now haveconf-c++
andconf-g++
in opam-repository, and it's not possible to refer to their boolean variables in the natural syntax:results in
I think it should be sufficient simply to allow one or more
+
characters in theident
regular expression.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: