feat: add autonomy manager

[vie-serendipity]

chore: gci write

chore: add parameter

fix: run autonomy manager asynchronously

fix: disable autonomy manager if it's a cloud node

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment only one /kind <> line, hit enter to put that in a new line, and remove leading whitespace from that line:
/kind bug
/kind documentation
/kind enhancement
/kind good-first-issue
/kind feature
/kind question
/kind design
/sig ai
/sig iot
/sig network
/sig storage

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Supplement autonomy ability.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

other Note

[rambohe-ch]

@vie-serendipity Thanks for posting this pull request. it is ready for reviewing or not?

[vie-serendipity]

@rambohe-ch I think it's ready for review, I just need to modify and add more tests.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.31579% with 96 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 56.37%. Comparing base (3713163) to head (eb9b2ef).
Report is 13 commits behind head on master.

Files	Patch %	Lines
pkg/yurthub/proxy/autonomy/autonomy.go	55.76%	36 Missing and 10 partials ⚠️
pkg/yurthub/cachemanager/error_keys.go	79.85%	19 Missing and 8 partials ⚠️
pkg/yurthub/cachemanager/cache_manager.go	44.44%	14 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
pkg/yurthub/util/util.go	66.66%	3 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
pkg/yurthub/proxy/local/faketoken.go	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2033      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   56.09%   56.37%   +0.27%     
==========================================
  Files         186      188       +2     
  Lines       18092    18328     +236     
==========================================
+ Hits        10149    10332     +183     
- Misses       6910     6943      +33     
- Partials     1033     1053      +20     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	56.37% <66.31%> (+0.27%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[vie-serendipity]

/rerun

[vie-serendipity]

/rerun

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
2 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[rambohe-ch]

@vie-serendipity please fix the conflicting files.

[vie-serendipity]

/rerun

[vie-serendipity]

/rerun

[vie-serendipity]

/rerun

[rambohe-ch]

/LGTM