Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Validity checks for interchange format #110

Open
JGuetschow opened this issue Jun 7, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Validity checks for interchange format #110

JGuetschow opened this issue Jun 7, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority: low Low priority issue: nice to have but not urgend to tackle this

Comments

@JGuetschow
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

When reading data into the primap2 interchange format rules are more lenient than for the native pm2 format, leading to errors on conversion from IF to native format. Examples:

  • Entity names can contain characters confusing pint (e.g. HFC-32, where the '-' is interpreted as 'minus')
  • More examples to be added

Describe the solution you'd like

Check for consistency with native format to make sure conversion is possible. Currently a validity check is only implemented for the native format.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Keep as is to have less restrictions int he interchange format.

Additional context

Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

@JGuetschow JGuetschow added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 7, 2022
@JGuetschow JGuetschow self-assigned this Jun 7, 2022
@JGuetschow JGuetschow changed the title Consistency checks for interchnage format Validity checks for interchange format Jun 7, 2022
@JGuetschow JGuetschow added the priority: low Low priority issue: nice to have but not urgend to tackle this label Mar 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority: low Low priority issue: nice to have but not urgend to tackle this
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant