Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

First-class support for async functions #442

Open
matthew-russo opened this issue Apr 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

First-class support for async functions #442

matthew-russo opened this issue Apr 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
2.0-wishlist This issue proposes breaking changes we'd like in a 2.0 release feature-request This issue is requesting new functionality

Comments

@matthew-russo
Copy link
Member

title is fairly self-explanatory. today there is no built-in support for testing async functions.

we need an answer to:

  • whether this is supported in the decl macro, attr macro, or both
  • whether users are able to provide a runtime or whether proptest uses various feature flags to have support for individual runtimes (and which ones? tokio, actix, glommio monoio, async-std, others?)
  • is this just sugar at the macro level or are we changing something about the internals of TestRunner to better support futures?
@matthew-russo matthew-russo added 2.0-wishlist This issue proposes breaking changes we'd like in a 2.0 release feature-request This issue is requesting new functionality labels Apr 8, 2024
@matthew-russo matthew-russo mentioned this issue Apr 8, 2024
Open
@matthew-russo
Copy link
Member Author

See #185 for past attempt.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
2.0-wishlist This issue proposes breaking changes we'd like in a 2.0 release feature-request This issue is requesting new functionality
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@matthew-russo