Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Question][Hw2] Order of a model of satisfiable case #52

Closed
KihongHeo opened this issue Sep 29, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

[Question][Hw2] Order of a model of satisfiable case #52

KihongHeo opened this issue Sep 29, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@KihongHeo
Copy link
Contributor

Hello. This is a duplicated question. Copyright: #51.

I have been implementing the solvers for Hw2.
I believe I have correctly implemented the program equivalence checker, in that I think it prints "satisfiable" along with a model when the programs are not equivalent, and "unsatisfiable" when they are equivalent.

[Small change]

However, for some reason, when printing a model in which the programs give different results, my implementation prints the variables in a different order than was provided on Github.

[Small change]

Below is a picture of my testing with the eq3.scm file.
Instead of printing in tgt_x -> src_x -> src_y order,
it does in tgt_x -> src_y -> src_x order.

My question is, does the order of printing a satisfying model matter?

Thank you.

===
Sorry for unnecessary notification emails.

@KihongHeo KihongHeo changed the title [Question][HW2] duplicate detection test [Question][HW2] Order of a model of satisfiable case (test) Sep 29, 2022
@KihongHeo KihongHeo changed the title [Question][HW2] Order of a model of satisfiable case (test) [Question][Hw2] Order of a model of satisfiable case Sep 29, 2022
@KihongHeo
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am surprised that there is no good duplicated issue detector in Github Market Place. The existing one is not very satisfactory.

If some of you are interested in developing such a Github bot with me, let me know.

@Allgot
Copy link

Allgot commented Sep 29, 2022

Well, I'm absolutely interested in it but I'm afraid I don't know which ability is required. Could you explain it in detail?

@KihongHeo
Copy link
Contributor Author

I don't know, too.
But if we really want to do something, we will know and we must know! Don't worry.

Maybe

  • programming in JavaScript to make a custom action
  • basic skills for docker container
  • basic programming skills for REST APIs to use a text similarity check and Github APIs

If you are interested in, email me (kihong.heo@kaist.ac.kr).

@KihongHeo KihongHeo reopened this May 30, 2024
@KihongHeo KihongHeo added the Q&A label May 31, 2024
@prosyslab-classroom prosyslab-classroom locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 31, 2024
@KihongHeo KihongHeo converted this issue into discussion #371 May 31, 2024

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants