Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can we get more attention in the threaded client interface? #1450

Closed
jmrbcu opened this issue Mar 1, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Can we get more attention in the threaded client interface? #1450

jmrbcu opened this issue Mar 1, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@jmrbcu
Copy link

jmrbcu commented Mar 1, 2024

Reading past issues and using it myself, I realized that the threading implementation can get more love. Not all of us want to use asyncio or mix asyncio code with threaded code. There are missing features (no ping intervals, no automatic reconnection, etc) in this implementation and some weird behavior.

@aaugustin
Copy link
Member

It's quite new and hasn't received as much real-world usage as the legacy implementation.

Maybe I'll bring it to feature parity eventually. At this time, I'm prioritizing #1332.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants