Release slopes 1.0.1

[Robinlovelace]

First release:

• usethis::use_cran_comments()
• Proof read Title: and Description:
• Check that all exported functions have @returns and @examples
• Check that Authors@R: includes a copyright holder (role 'cph')
• Check licensing of included files
• Review https://github.com/DavisVaughan/extrachecks

Prepare for release:

• devtools::build_readme()
• urlchecker::url_check()
• devtools::check(remote = TRUE, manual = TRUE)
• devtools::check_win_devel()
• rhub::check_for_cran()

Submit to CRAN:

• usethis::use_version('patch')
• devtools::submit_cran()
• Approve email

Wait for CRAN...

• Accepted 🎉
• usethis::use_github_release()
• usethis::use_dev_version()
• Update install instructions in README

[Robinlovelace]

That was created with usethis::use_release_issue(). I think it's worth bumping the version number for the updated rOpenSci release.

[Robinlovelace]

I submitted this to CRAN to test on Windows with

devtools::check_win_devel()

[Robinlovelace]

Lots of notes that would prevent this being accepted here: https://win-builder.r-project.org/HSe2yP3F475P/00check.log

[Robinlovelace]

devtools::document()
ℹ Updating slopes documentation
ℹ Loading slopes
Writing NAMESPACE
Writing NAMESPACE
Writing lisbon_road_network.Rd
Writing lisbon_road_segment.Rd
Writing elevation_get.Rd
Writing slopes-package.Rd
> urlchecker::url_update()
✔ Updated: <https://github.com/ITSLeeds/slopes/> to <https://github.com/ropensci/slopes> in 'man/slopes-package.Rd'
✔ Updated: <https://github.com/ITSLeeds/slopes#installation-for-dem-downloads> to <https://github.com/ropensci/slopes> in 'man/elevation_get.Rd'
✔ Updated: <https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/analysis/> to <http://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/analysis/> in 'man/lisbon_road_network.Rd'
✔ Updated: <https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/analysis/> to <http://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/analysis/> in 'man/lisbon_road_segment.Rd'
✖ Error: vignettes/roadnetworkcycling.Rmd:103:6 403: Forbidden
u = "https://github.com/U-Shift/Declives-RedeViaria/releases/download/0.2/IsleOfWightNASA_clip.tif"
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
✖ Error: vignettes/verification.Rmd:47:35 403: Forbidden
[figshare website as a .zip file](https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14331185)
                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
✖ Error: vignettes/verification.Rmd:51:16 403: Forbidden
download.file("https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14331185", "3DGRT_AXIS_EPSG25830_v2.zip")
               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
✖ Error: README.md:49:9 404: Not Found
slopes](https://ropensci.github.io/intro-to-slopes/) vignette.
        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
✖ Error: vignettes/slopes.Rmd:214:364 404: Not Found
Using the slopes package we can estimate the gradient of individual road segments. When these segments are combined into routes, we then need a means of assessing the hilliness of the entire route. A range of indices can be used to represent route hilliness. The choice of which index is most appropriate may be context dependent (see the [introducion to slopes](https://ropensci.github.io/intro-to-slopes/) vignette).
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[temospena]

should we try to replace https://ropensci.github.io/ to https://docs.ropensci.org/ for it to work?

[Robinlovelace]

should we try to replace https://ropensci.github.io/ to https://docs.ropensci.org/ for it to work?

Yes good plan. We can also remove the offending URLs and make them not hyperlinks, e.g. saying ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14331185 instead of https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14331185

[maelle]

@Robinlovelace what help is needed?

[Robinlovelace]

General motivation, which is already provided, thanks for the nudge! I'm not sure but suspect there are some things that are not CRAN ready right now, any pointers on up-to-date ways to test them welcome.

[maelle]

I think you're using the correct checklist by having called usethis::use_release_issue() as it links to https://github.com/DavisVaughan/extrachecks 😁

[maelle]

but please ping me if there's a specific difficulty.

[Robinlovelace]

Hi @maelle finally catching up oon this after a veeery long time, in IRL convo with @temospena. Will give this a go...

[Robinlovelace]

Just a follow-up on specific issues we're hitting, getting this error with devtools::check() and not sure what's causing it let alone how to debug at this stage:

   Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed.
   Last 13 lines of output:
     ── Error ('test-slopes.R:77:3'): slope_* functions work ────────────────────────
     Error in `valid_numeric_matrix(x)`: !anyNA(x) is not TRUE
     Backtrace:
         ▆
      1. └─slopes::elevation_add(r) at test-slopes.R:77:3
      2.   └─base::lapply(...)
      3.     └─slopes (local) FUN(X[[i]], ...)
      4.       └─sf::st_linestring(m_xyz[m[, 3] == i, ])
      5.         └─sf:::Mtrx(x, dim, type = "LINESTRING")
      6.           └─sf:::valid_numeric_matrix(x)
      7.             └─base::stopifnot(is.numeric(x), is.matrix(x), !anyNA(x))
     
     [ FAIL 1 | WARN 1 | SKIP 0 | PASS 39 ]

If anyone can reproduce that or suggest debugging ideas that would be greatly appeciated 🙏

[Robinlovelace]

Any support from rOpenSci on this very welcome 🙏 🙏

[maelle]

will come back to this later this week. in the meantime maybe use the #package-maintenance Slack channel.

[Robinlovelace]

Will do, thanks Maelle!

[mpadge]

Just an idea because of passing through sf::Mtrx, but it could be related to breaking changes in Matrix package, with solutions suggested in https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-package-devel/2024q2/010640.html

[Robinlovelace]

Woa thanks Mark, that sounds familiar, good on you for having such info at your fingertips!