-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 302
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
reverse dependency checks for 0.7.0, round 3 #885
Comments
FYI I will update radiant.model as soon as the new version of broom hits and make 0.7.0 required. With the changes in how dfs are reported by broom for logistic regression it would be a bit of a mess to support multiple versions. |
@vnijs Sounds great, thanks! Will make note of that. :-) |
This issue has been automatically locked. If you believe you have found a related problem, please file a new issue (with a reprex: https://reprex.tidyverse.org) and link to this issue. |
Another round of reverse dependency checks for broom 0.7.0 (on the
0.7.0-rc
branch)—since the first round of checks in #862, 20 of 37 contacted maintainers have updated their packages on CRAN, and we've also softened some deprecations since round 2 of revdepchecks, at the CRAN team's request, resulting in 3 prior failures being remedied. I'll keep this table up to date as I check in on each of these issues.New problems (20)
conf.int
defaults.) Not hosted on GitHub, so reached out to the maintainer by email again.master
branch a month ago—waiting to submit until 0.7.0 is posted.tidy.aov
.) Dropped a note in the issue from the first round of checks.master
, and will be submitted once broom is on CRAN.broom.mixed
. Fixed 28 days ago on the devel branch and will be submitted to CRAN once broom is released.broom.mixed
. No response on the issue filed a month ago, just checked in again.master
branch.master
branch.conf.int
defaults. Checked in on the issue filed a month ago.Update 24 June 2020—just worked through each of these issues. Of the 17 remaining issues, 9 of them have been fixed in development versions and are waiting on the release of 0.7.0 to submit. I've reached out to maintainers for all remaining issues, besides
eyetrackingR
which currently does not have a maintainer.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: