Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

placement: Consider Pending peers and downPeers during FitRegion #2796

Open
Yisaer opened this issue Aug 19, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

placement: Consider Pending peers and downPeers during FitRegion #2796

Yisaer opened this issue Aug 19, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
component/placement Placement rule. type/enhancement The issue or PR belongs to an enhancement.

Comments

@Yisaer
Copy link
Contributor

Yisaer commented Aug 19, 2020

Feature Request

Describe your feature request related problem

Currently, FitRegion in placement only consider the peers and leader information without stats like downing and pending peers which would causing select downPeer in FitRegion and let normal peer as orphan peer and creating an unnecessary scheduling operator.

Describe the feature you'd like

Considering Peering peers and downPeers during FitRegion

Describe alternatives you've considered

Teachability, Documentation, Adoption, Migration Strategy
@Yisaer Yisaer added type/enhancement The issue or PR belongs to an enhancement. component/placement Placement rule. labels Aug 19, 2020
@Yisaer Yisaer mentioned this issue Aug 19, 2020
Merged
@disksing
Copy link
Contributor

I think down peer should be more important. Pending peers could be recovered soon.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
component/placement Placement rule. type/enhancement The issue or PR belongs to an enhancement.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@disksing @Yisaer