Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vacuum diagrams using diagrams_() #485

Open
pschicho opened this issue Mar 4, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Vacuum diagrams using diagrams_() #485

pschicho opened this issue Mar 4, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@pschicho
Copy link

pschicho commented Mar 4, 2024

Testing the new diagram generation function in FORM 5.0-beta.1 with QCD, as a specific model, I ran into the result below.

I am specifically trying to generate vacuum diagrams i.e. diagrams that have zero external legs. While symmetry factors seem to be correct, at 2loop level it seems that not all topologies are covered. Here e.g. only one topology is generated which is the sunset diagram. Although at 2loop level I would have also expected there to be another topology, the figure 8 diagram.

A similar situation appears when going to 3loops. Also not all the particle content seems to be used and only a fully gluon mercedes diagram is generated while there should also be mercedes diagrams with fermion and ghost content.

Additionally I noticed that the print statement did not work for me in this version -- I had to use #write to see any output.
Also the commented bracketing command b s1; caused the script to terminate.

    auto s s;
    
    #define LOOPS "2"
    #do i = 0,`LOOPS'
    Model QCD`i';
        Particle qua,QUA,-2;
        Particle gho,GHO,-1;
        Particle glu,+3;
        Vertex qua,QUA,glu:g;
        Vertex gho,GHO,glu:g;
        Vertex glu,glu,glu:g;
        Vertex glu,glu,glu,glu:g^2;
    EndModel;
    #enddo
    Vector Q,Q1,...,Q7,p,p0,...,p21;
    Symbols x1,x2,n1,...,n14;
    Indices j1,j2,i1,...,i21;
    Set QQ:Q1,...,Q7;
    Set pp:p1,...,p21;
    Set empty:;
    .global
    * L  Fprop`LOOPS' = diagrams_(QCD`LOOPS',empty,empty,QQ,pp,`LOOPS',
    *                 `OnePI_'+`NoTadpoles_'+`Symmetrize_'+`TopologiesOnly_');
    L  Fprop`LOOPS' = diagrams_(QCD`LOOPS',empty,empty,QQ,pp,`LOOPS',
                    `OnePI_'+`NoTadpoles_'+`Symmetrize_');
    
    * L XX = (s1+s2)^10;
    
    * b s1;
    print+s;
    .sort

Time =       0.00 sec    Generated terms =          3
          Fprop2         Terms in output =          3
                         Bytes used      =        960
    
    #write "%+E",Fprop`LOOPS' 
 - 1/2*topo_(1)*node_(1,g,qua(-p2),QUA(-p1),glu(-p3))*node_(2,g,qua(p1),QUA(p2
      ),glu(p3))
       - 1/2*topo_(1)*node_(1,g,gho(-p2),GHO(-p1),glu(-p3))*node_(2,g,gho(p1),
      GHO(p2),glu(p3))
       + 1/12*topo_(1)*node_(1,g,glu(-p1),glu(-p2),glu(-p3))*node_(2,g,glu(p1)
      ,glu(p2),glu(p3))
    .end

Time =       0.00 sec    Generated terms =          3
          Fprop2         Terms in output =          3
                         Bytes used      =        960
  0.00 sec out of 0.00 sec
@tueda
Copy link
Collaborator

tueda commented Mar 4, 2024

Indeed it seems that diagrams_ has some problems (incomplete?), while I have no problems with Print and Bracket.

@pschicho
Copy link
Author

pschicho commented Mar 6, 2024

It seems like Print and Bracket were faulty after compilation even though checks seemed ok. But it was related to some Library location hiccup for CommandLineTools on MacOS.

Concerning the `diagrams_' command, the error persists. I have not done further checking than the zero-external leg diagrams. But having this feature to reliably generate bubble diagrams directly would certainly also be desirable in a future version.

@tueda
Copy link
Collaborator

tueda commented Mar 11, 2024

Just wondering which version of the algorithm is implemented. The manual refers this paper but the paper says in its introduction

In order to make the problem simpler, we assume the following conditions:

  1. Vacuum-to-vacuum graphs are not considered.

though how to loosen this restriction is described in Section 6.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants