Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

attaching the same container from multiple terminal is problematic #2214

Open
caglar10ur opened this issue Aug 31, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

attaching the same container from multiple terminal is problematic #2214

caglar10ur opened this issue Aug 31, 2016 · 2 comments
Labels
area/docker Support for the Docker operations component/portlayer/interaction component/tether kind/debt Problems that increase the cost of other work priority/p4

Comments

@caglar10ur
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like we round-robin between them so each gets some of it.

@hickeng suggested duplicating the stream in personality or in the portlayer instead of creating individual connections from client to tether for each attach operation.

@caglar10ur caglar10ur added this to the VIC GA Release milestone Aug 31, 2016
@mdubya66 mdubya66 added the impact/doc/note Requires creation of or changes to an official release note label Sep 20, 2016
@mdubya66 mdubya66 removed this from the VIC GA Release milestone Sep 20, 2016
@mdubya66
Copy link
Contributor

Moving to Icebox per 9/20 Triage

@caglar10ur caglar10ur removed the impact/doc/note Requires creation of or changes to an official release note label Nov 7, 2016
@stuclem
Copy link
Contributor

stuclem commented Nov 7, 2016

Already in the release notes, so removing the kind/note tag.

@hmahmood hmahmood added the kind/debt Problems that increase the cost of other work label Apr 12, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/docker Support for the Docker operations component/portlayer/interaction component/tether kind/debt Problems that increase the cost of other work priority/p4
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants