-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
/
3QeRB-XbM2s.vtt
335 lines (267 loc) · 8.31 KB
/
3QeRB-XbM2s.vtt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
WEBVTT
1
00:00:00.030 --> 00:00:04.290
<v Speaker 1>Elegance is an interesting concept.</v>
<v Speaker 1>It's very controversial.</v>
2
00:00:04.800 --> 00:00:06.450
<v Speaker 1>In fact,</v>
<v Speaker 1>if you,</v>
3
00:00:09.090 --> 00:00:14.090
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that continually </v>
<v Speaker 1>happens over and over again in </v>
4
00:00:14.090 --> 00:00:16.791
<v Speaker 1>psychology is that psychologists </v>
<v Speaker 1>discover all sorts of new kinds of </v>
5
00:00:16.791 --> 00:00:20.001
<v Speaker 1>intelligence and you know,</v>
<v Speaker 1>the biggest two proponents of that sort </v>
6
00:00:20.001 --> 00:00:24.741
<v Speaker 1>of thing.</v>
<v Speaker 1>I suppose we're Bob Sternberg who came </v>
7
00:00:24.741 --> 00:00:24.741
<v Speaker 1>up with this thing equaled practical </v>
<v Speaker 1>intelligence.</v>
8
00:00:24.741 --> 00:00:29.181
<v Speaker 1>And then Howard Gardner who came up with</v>
<v Speaker 1>the theory of multiple intelligences </v>
9
00:00:29.181 --> 00:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>which had a very large effect on </v>
<v Speaker 1>educational psychology,</v>
10
00:00:32.270 --> 00:00:34.500
<v Speaker 1>um,</v>
<v Speaker 1>when the theory was first proposed.</v>
11
00:00:34.560 --> 00:00:36.900
<v Speaker 1>And that's not saying much because </v>
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking,</v>
12
00:00:36.901 --> 00:00:41.901
<v Speaker 1>it's very difficult to find a discipline</v>
<v Speaker 1>that's more susceptible to fads than </v>
13
00:00:41.940 --> 00:00:45.180
<v Speaker 1>educational psychology.</v>
<v Speaker 1>And as far as I can tell,</v>
14
00:00:45.181 --> 00:00:48.300
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking,</v>
<v Speaker 1>each fat is worse than the previous one.</v>
15
00:00:48.900 --> 00:00:50.220
<v Speaker 1>So,</v>
<v Speaker 1>you know,</v>
16
00:00:50.221 --> 00:00:53.850
<v Speaker 1>Gardner positive that I think there were</v>
<v Speaker 1>seven.</v>
17
00:00:53.910 --> 00:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh,</v>
<v Speaker 1>there they are,</v>
18
00:00:54.601 --> 00:00:58.530
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight different intelligence,</v>
<v Speaker 1>linguistic,</v>
19
00:00:58.531 --> 00:00:59.670
<v Speaker 1>musical,</v>
<v Speaker 1>logical,</v>
20
00:00:59.671 --> 00:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>mathematical,</v>
<v Speaker 1>spacial body,</v>
21
00:01:01.801 --> 00:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>kinesthetic,</v>
<v Speaker 1>intrapersonal and interpersonal.</v>
22
00:01:05.760 --> 00:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>And people talk about emotional </v>
<v Speaker 1>intelligence and they talk about </v>
23
00:01:10.760 --> 00:01:11.670
<v Speaker 1>practical intelligence.</v>
<v Speaker 1>And as far as I'm concerned,</v>
24
00:01:11.671 --> 00:01:16.050
<v Speaker 1>all of that is complete rubbish.</v>
<v Speaker 1>And there's technical reasons for that.</v>
25
00:01:16.080 --> 00:01:19.230
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's technical and </v>
<v Speaker 1>philosophical reasons for that.</v>
26
00:01:19.620 --> 00:01:22.680
<v Speaker 1>The first thing is you can't just mess </v>
<v Speaker 1>up a word,</v>
27
00:01:23.130 --> 00:01:28.130
<v Speaker 1>you know,</v>
<v Speaker 1>the whole point of having a word is so </v>
28
00:01:28.130 --> 00:01:30.321
<v Speaker 1>that it defined some things that </v>
<v Speaker 1>described some things and doesn't </v>
29
00:01:30.321 --> 00:01:30.321
<v Speaker 1>describe other things.</v>
<v Speaker 1>Right,</v>
30
00:01:30.321 --> 00:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and so you can.</v>
<v Speaker 1>You can make the word intelligence a </v>
31
00:01:35.000 --> 00:01:38.610
<v Speaker 1>current for whatever you want,</v>
<v Speaker 1>so you can say that the ability to dance</v>
32
00:01:38.611 --> 00:01:43.611
<v Speaker 1>as a form of intelligence,</v>
<v Speaker 1>but the problem with that is you blur </v>
33
00:01:43.611 --> 00:01:45.990
<v Speaker 1>out the word so badly.</v>
<v Speaker 1>You can't tell what it means anymore.</v>
34
00:01:46.470 --> 00:01:51.470
<v Speaker 1>And so,</v>
<v Speaker 1>and I would also point out we had </v>
35
00:01:51.470 --> 00:01:53.421
<v Speaker 1>perfectly good words for those major </v>
<v Speaker 1>intelligence as we called them talents </v>
36
00:01:53.421 --> 00:01:58.070
<v Speaker 1>and so it's perfectly reasonable to make</v>
<v Speaker 1>a distinction between the talent and </v>
37
00:01:58.070 --> 00:01:58.350
<v Speaker 1>intelligence.</v>
38
00:01:58.350 --> 00:01:59.490
<v Speaker 1>Now you might say,</v>
<v Speaker 1>well,</v>
39
00:01:59.491 --> 00:02:04.491
<v Speaker 1>how the hell do you know the difference?</v>
<v Speaker 1>Like if if things look similar to some </v>
40
00:02:04.491 --> 00:02:06.540
<v Speaker 1>degree,</v>
<v Speaker 1>then how do you know if they're the same</v>
41
00:02:06.541 --> 00:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>or different?</v>
<v Speaker 1>Well,</v>
42
00:02:07.441 --> 00:02:10.650
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly what you do when you do </v>
<v Speaker 1>the construct validity process.</v>
43
00:02:10.651 --> 00:02:15.651
<v Speaker 1>So let's say you rated a number of </v>
<v Speaker 1>people on their dancing ability and then</v>
44
00:02:16.261 --> 00:02:20.010
<v Speaker 1>you rated the number of people on their </v>
<v Speaker 1>ability to multiply two digit,</v>
45
00:02:20.240 --> 00:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>two,</v>
<v Speaker 1>two digit numbers in their head quickly </v>
46
00:02:25.240 --> 00:02:28.700
<v Speaker 1>while then you see,</v>
<v Speaker 1>technically if both of those were </v>
47
00:02:28.700 --> 00:02:32.331
<v Speaker 1>intelligences,</v>
<v Speaker 1>then the people who could dance better </v>
48
00:02:32.331 --> 00:02:35.421
<v Speaker 1>could multiply two digit numbers faster </v>
<v Speaker 1>in their head and that they would be </v>
49
00:02:35.491 --> 00:02:40.491
<v Speaker 1>slightly positive story.</v>
<v Speaker 1>See,</v>
50
00:02:41.881 --> 00:02:44.010
<v Speaker 1>that's what happens when I don't have </v>
<v Speaker 1>any diet coke.</v>
51
00:02:46.740 --> 00:02:51.740
<v Speaker 1>So anyways,</v>
<v Speaker 1>if intelligence was the right word to </v>
52
00:02:51.740 --> 00:02:55.671
<v Speaker 1>subsume both of those,</v>
<v Speaker 1>then what you see is that would be a </v>
53
00:02:55.671 --> 00:02:59.811
<v Speaker 1>high correlation that people who are </v>
<v Speaker 1>good dancers would also be the ones who </v>
54
00:02:59.811 --> 00:03:02.991
<v Speaker 1>could multiply most rapidly.</v>
<v Speaker 1>And I mean multiply in their head,</v>
55
00:03:04.090 --> 00:03:07.060
<v Speaker 1>um,</v>
<v Speaker 1>but that,</v>
56
00:03:07.120 --> 00:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>but you're not going to be able to </v>
<v Speaker 1>extract out a single factor like that.</v>
57
00:03:10.780 --> 00:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>It's just not,</v>
<v Speaker 1>it's just not the case that those things</v>
58
00:03:13.481 --> 00:03:18.481
<v Speaker 1>associate like that.</v>
<v Speaker 1>So for something to be one phenomena,</v>
59
00:03:22.490 --> 00:03:27.490
<v Speaker 1>the things that it.</v>
<v Speaker 1>Obviously I've talked too much this </v>
60
00:03:29.871 --> 00:03:34.871
<v Speaker 1>semester,</v>
<v Speaker 1>all the things that are subsumed under </v>
61
00:03:35.371 --> 00:03:40.371
<v Speaker 1>that definition have to be correlated </v>
<v Speaker 1>and highly correlated because otherwise </v>
62
00:03:40.590 --> 00:03:44.070
<v Speaker 1>they're not the same thing.</v>
<v Speaker 1>It's the definition of the same thing.</v>
63
00:03:44.910 --> 00:03:48.900
<v Speaker 1>Now,</v>
<v Speaker 1>Iq is a very peculiar construct,</v>
64
00:03:50.540 --> 00:03:53.850
<v Speaker 1>a very unique construct from a </v>
<v Speaker 1>psychological perspective,</v>
65
00:03:53.880 --> 00:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>but also more generally from a social </v>
<v Speaker 1>science perspective because Iq has the </v>
66
00:03:59.521 --> 00:04:04.521
<v Speaker 1>most predictive validity of anything </v>
<v Speaker 1>ever discovered in the social sciences </v>
67
00:04:04.521 --> 00:04:04.950
<v Speaker 1>period.</v>