Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[AAELF64] Reserve relocation codes for PAuthABIELF64 #100

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2021

Conversation

smithp35
Copy link
Contributor

The Alpha PAuthABIELF64 defines a small number of static and dynamic
relocations in the private vendor experiment space. When an upstream
implementation lands we will want to use non-experimental codes.
Step 1 is to reserve a range of static and dynamic relocations in
AAELF64 so we can guarantee no clash with any relocations defined in
the PAuthABI. When PAuthABIELF64 gets to Release state then
relocations can be added to the AAELF64 and the reservation can be
removed.

The Alpha PAuthABIELF64 defines a small number of static and dynamic
relocations in the private vendor experiment space. When an upstream
implementation lands we will want to use non-experimental codes.
Step 1 is to reserve a range of static and dynamic relocations in
AAELF64 so we can guarantee no clash with any relocations defined in
the PAuthABI. When PAuthABIELF64 gets to Release state then
relocations can be added to the AAELF64 and the reservation can be
removed.
Copy link
Member

@stuij stuij left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@stuij stuij merged commit 23c65b7 into ARM-software:main May 24, 2021
Copy link

@sallyarmneale sallyarmneale left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me

Copy link

@sallyarmneale sallyarmneale left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants